First Presbyterian Church of Santa Rosa

    Suggestions for Interpreting Genesis


    by Kent Webber

    As we begin our Fall sermon series “Living with Love and Loss — Genesis 1-12,” I want to address an important introductory question of how we interpret this portion of Scripture, especially related to science and scientific inquiry. Genesis means “origins” so it’s a book about beginnings, about the beginning of God’s work in creating the earth and our universe.

    Some people assume Genesis intends to provide a scientific account of creation and earth’s origins. It doesn’t. There was science in the ancient world as both Babylonians and Egyptians made advances in the fields of mathematics, astronomy, geology, chemistry, and medicine. However the biblical writers never focus on those areas of interest. It was much later, in about the sixteenth century, when what we know today as “modern science” finally emerged with the use of disciplined inquiry, critical observation, and analytical experimentation. In 2 Timothy 3:15 Paul talks about the nature and overall purpose of Scripture as “the sacred writings that are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” This means the grand, overall purpose of the Bible is to instruct us for salvation through faith in Christ, to be a guide for what we believe and how best to live out our faith day to day. Scripture does not serve as a scientific guide and no such claim is ever made by the biblical writers.

    In the fourth-century, Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, viewed Scripture not as a scientific textbook or an academic tract, but as the Book of Life. When Felix the Manichean claimed that the Holy Spirit had revealed to Maicheus the orbits of the heavenly bodies, Augustine replied that God desired us to become Christians, not astronomers. Our sixteenth-century Reformed Church leader, John Calvin, taught that to preserve the intentions of the biblical writers we must remember that their purpose was to bring us the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ, not information in general, including in the field of science. In the seventeenth-century, one of the Westminster Divines (English and Scottish theologians whom Parliament invited to write a national statement of faith) Samuel Rutherford, said that Scripture intended to mediate salvation in Christ, not communicate information about science, mentioning astronomy specifically.

    What this all means is that in our Reformed Tradition we believe Holy Scripture is our authoritative guide “for faith and life” – for what we believe and how we live, as we seek to be “instructed for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.”

    In the first chapter of Genesis we can see the non-scientific approach taken by the Spirit-inspired writer. For example, while we know that our daylight comes from the sun, a relatively nearby star, Genesis tells us that light was created on day one of creation, while the stars and planets did not come into existence until day four. Further, we know that plants grow via photosynthesis, yet plants came into existence on day two of creation, while the sun is not created until day three. You can see the problem.

    If Genesis does not intend or claim to be a scientific account of creation, to provide us with biological, geological, and astronomical information, how should we read the book, especially the first eleven chapters which focus on a “primeval prologue” to the entire biblical narrative? While these eleven chapters are not myths or legends, neither is the material contained in them “history” in the modern sense of eye-witness, objective reporting. What they do teach us are profound theological truths in story form; such as:

    One thing worth noting is that when we read Genesis it is not the earliest creation account we have. Scholars tell us that the Babylonian epic called “Enuma Elish” (“When on high…”) was written prior to Genesis. Biblical scholar Nahum Sarna speaks of Genesis as part of the biblical polemic against paganism. Genesis and Enuma Elish do share the same vision of the primeval state as a watery chaos, have the same basic order of creation, and conclude with the divine rest. However, the writer of Genesis is purposefully providing a distinctly different message than Enuma Elish. Without going into detail about that Mesopotamian account, let me simply draw some distinctions between the account of creation we find in Genesis vs. that which is contained in Enuma Elish.

    I hope this brief introduction provides a helpful context for your reading of Genesis 1-12 and some interpretative guideline for our Fall sermon series “Living with Love and Loss.”

    Published on September 7, 2021


    Articles by Month
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017






    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    * indicates required
    Email Format

    View previous campaigns.